[1] Mammut HI-MAM-026-9
Six-row frequency table (unused ≤10 yr … near-daily <1 yr). Immediate discard for factor ≥1 falls, extreme sheath wear, chemicals, heat, core visible.
Educational reference · Not certification
Answer a few questions. We’ll compare your rope to Mammut, Petzl, and REI guidance — and tell you plainly whether to retire it, replace it soon, or keep inspecting. Educational only — never a certificate.
For climbers checking the source text: every claim in Linecheck points back to a public page or PDF. Citations use [1]–[4] throughout the calculator.
Jump to calculator →Six-row frequency table (unused ≤10 yr … near-daily <1 yr). Immediate discard for factor ≥1 falls, extreme sheath wear, chemicals, heat, core visible.
Replace when confidence is gone, sheath too worn, hernia/defect, significant impact, chemicals, or more than ~10 years from manufacture.
REI-style here is a comparison against published frequency bands; year figures are aligned with / close to Mammut’s six-row table, not an independent manufacturer table. REI also covers extreme loads, cuts/flat spots/fuzz, and fall logs.
Pit Schubert: ageing is driven by metres of use and abrasion; storage UV is minor vs use; sulphuric acid can destroy a rope invisibly.
Red flags always win. Then age, frequency, and sourced wear factors adjust the reading.
Open calculator →Answer the short path first. The verdict sticks while you scroll. Citations [1]–[4] match the documents above.
Sources: [1] Mammut [2] Petzl [3] REI [4] UIAA
Is this a safety certificate? No. Linecheck is an educational reference. It never labels a rope Safe, Certified, or cleared to climb.
Why are red flags first? Manufacturer consensus: extreme falls, visible damage, chemicals, heat, or unknown rope history (not merely an unknown year) override age arithmetic. Any Yes → RETIRE NOW.
What do the wear & context controls do? They apply conservative qualitative multipliers (sheath fuzz, storage, gym/outdoor, fall log, thin diameter outdoors) from Mammut, Petzl, REI, and UIAA. When several cut together, Linecheck may combine and cap them at about 70% of the guidance-table years — the tool’s conservative adjustment, not a manufacturer figure. That floor never lifts a red flag or extreme/heavy sheath “RETIRE NOW.”
What does awaiting mean? Without a valid manufacture year the lifespan table cannot run.
Why Mammut as default? It publishes an explicit six-row frequency table (HI-MAM-026-9).
What does REI-style mean? REI-style is a comparison against published frequency bands; the year figures are aligned with / close to Mammut’s six-row table, not an independent manufacturer table. REI’s article lists approximate bands — we encode upper ends where REI gave a range.
Does UIAA set a lifespan? UIAA 101 / EN 892 test new ropes. They do not set a universal in-service lifespan.